Supply-chain visibility

Track supplier risk, delays, inventory, and operational exceptions.

57/100
opportunity score

Source trail

Supporting evidence

3 strongest signals shown

GitHubgithub issue26 Jul 2026

[AGENT BRIDGE] AssistMe coordination

Matched: source query

↗

GitHubgithub issue13 Jul 2026

[GOVERNANCE] Nexus 五道事件驱动交付 Gate 与唯一根因账本

Matched: source query

↗

GitHubgithub issue26 Jul 2026

[E306-PAPER-01][M7 / COMPARATIVE VALUE-ARCHITECTURE AUDIT AUTHORIZED / LOCAL RECONSTRUCTED CANDIDATE] Anchor–fibre framework and article

Matched: source query

↗

Score anatomy

Demand30% weight

Pain25% weight

Momentum20% weight

100

Competition gap15% weight

100

Confidence10% weight

Interpretation

3 demand signals and 3 explicit pain markers, with 0 recent supply signals.

Demand signals: 3
Pain markers: 3
Funded demand signals: 0
Identified public budget: 0 €
Unanswered questions: 0
Urgent security signals: 0
Regulatory signals: 0
Funding opportunities: 0
Funded research projects: 0
Supply signals: 0

Published formula

The total is 30% demand, 25% explicit pain, 20% momentum, 15% competition gap, and 10% confidence. Saturating curves limit viral outliers and recent evidence decays progressively. It is a prioritization signal, never a market-size claim.

Inspect sources and method →

Supply-chain visibility

Who may pay

What to test

Main risk

Supporting evidence

[AGENT BRIDGE] AssistMe coordination

[GOVERNANCE] Nexus 五道事件驱动交付 Gate 与唯一根因账本

[E306-PAPER-01][M7 / COMPARATIVE VALUE-ARCHITECTURE AUDIT AUTHORIZED / LOCAL RECONSTRUCTED CANDIDATE] Anchor–fibre framework and article